There are classifications gallore. Below is a comparison of one by DeShon, Chan, and Weissbein (1995) with one by Styles (2008):
DeShon et al Styles ? Analytic Both Either Visual ? 1 0 0 0 0 D/T 0 1 0 0 0 Distribution 0 2 0 0 0 Equation 0 1 3 0 8 S/D 0 1 0 0 0 S/D/T 0 3 1 0 0 S/T 0 0 0 0 1 Seriation 0 1 2 4 3 Transformation 0 3 0 0 1
Pretty good agreement between DeShon and co’s “visuospatial” and Styles’ “equation” (both what does and doesn’t fall into these buckets). The “equation” items concern those with “overlapping elements” – seems pretty visuospatial. Also neither classification codes item 15: DeShon and co say it violates the task instructions. The rest is a bit of a mess, but then Styles peeked at a higher resolution into the analytic items.
References
DeShon, R. P., Chan, D., & Weissbein, D. A. (1995). Verbal overshadowing effects on Raven’s Advanced Progressive Matrices: Evidence for multidimensional performance determinants. Intelligence, 21, 135-155
Styles, I. (2008). Linking Psychometric and Cognitive-Developmental Frameworks for Thinking About Intellectual Functioning. In Raven, J. & Raven, J. (ed.), Uses and Abuses of Intelligence: Studies Advancing Spearman and Raven’s Quest for Non-Arbitrary Metrics. Royal Fireworks Press.
Recent Comments